At the end of July, EU leaders struck a deal on a huge coronavirus recovery package after days of bitter talks. The €750billion (£668billion) coronavirus fund, spearheaded by France and Germany, will be used as loans and grants to the countries hit hardest by the virus. The remaining money represents the EU budget for the next seven years.
The talks began with a divide emerging between the hardest hit nations and those intent on a more “frugal” package of measures.
Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands and Austria all pushed back on an initial package of grants worth €500bn (£450billon), reportedly causing French President Emmanuel Macron to bang his fists in anger.
But despite coming to an agreement, the package is still causing havoc with member states.
Italy’s government crisis was triggered last month when former Prime Minister Matteo Renzi’s Italia Viva party withdrew its support from the coalition amid a row over how to spend the €200billion (£173bn)-plus that Italy is poised to receive from the recovery fund.
Not everyone in France is happy, either.
In an exclusive interview with Express.co.uk, French MEP Philippe Olivier, who also serves as special adviser to National Rally leader Marine Le Pen, has lashed out in a furious outburst against the bloc’s relief package.
He said: “There are many problems with it.
“First of all, it is a problem of competence.
“Many claim the EU was not in a legal position to contract such loans.
“And you can see very clearly how Brussels uses every crisis to advance forward towards a federalisation of Europe.
“Having a mutualised debt creating a common financial debt creates a financial state.”
Mr Philippe added: “France will be paying €80billion (£69bn) and we will get €40billion (£34bn) back.
“As Margaret Thatcher used to say: ‘I want my money back!'”
All EU countries contribute to the EU budget, and in return benefit from EU spending in their countries.
Because the bulk of the EU budget is spent on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which supports farmers’ incomes, countries with a large agricultural sector generally get more back than they put in.
Large countries like Germany are net contributors to the EU budget.
Britain used to be one.
JUST IN: Merkel’s ‘EU fiscal plan’ could be scuppered by German Court
However, in 1984, former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher negotiated a reduction of two-thirds in the UK’s net contribution, to be paid by other EU members, on the grounds that the agricultural subsidies favoured small farmers.
She reportedly banged her hands on the table and told her European colleagues: “I want my money back!”
There are millions of smallholders in France, who designed the system, and very few in Britain and even fewer in Scotland.
Mr Philippe added: “When you look at the whole picture, basically we don’t get our money’s worth.
“And also in regards to the use of funds, we don’t understand why we should lose our sovereignty on deciding what to do with these funds and transferring them to Europe.”
German MEP Gunnar Beck also questioned in another interview with Express.co.uk the legality of the funds.
EU apologised for ‘wrong’ fishing policy years before CFP legal row [INSIGHT]
EU’s ‘morally reprehensible’ vaccine move sparks crisis fears [REVEALED]
EU on brink as Merkel ‘faces economic slump’ [ANALYSIS]
Mr Beck explained: “The Recovery Fund is so expensive and unlawful.
“It is clearly against the wording of the articles 310 and 311 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the EU.
“They clearly state that the EU is not allowed to take debt on the financial market
“It is a breach of treaty.
“It is a breach of the EU constitution.”
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is one of two treaties forming the constitutional basis of the European Union, the other being the Treaty on European Union.
Article 310 reads: “With a view to maintaining budgetary discipline, the Union shall not adopt any act which is likely to have appreciable implications for the budget without providing an assurance that the expenditure arising from such an act is capable of being financed within the limit of the Union’s own resources and in compliance with the multiannual financial framework referred to in Article 312.”