China strengthens naval bases in South China Sea as tensions mount | World | News

0


The sudden expansion of the naval base is being watched closely by the US. China’s navy has expanded Yulin Naval Base on the island province of Hainan. The naval base is currently a conventional submarine facility.

But security analysts have proposed that the latest expansion is to allow for nuclear submarine bays.

Military news database GlobalSecurity.org said that intelligence had found four new trestles for submarines, each 229 meters long, that can accommodate 16 submarines.

Intelligence sources also stated the base will be made secure for China’s aircraft carriers.

Remote-sensing equipment are also expected to be based at the Yulin site.

Alexander Huang, strategic studies professor at Taiwan’s Tamkang University said: “It’s going to be kind of a future-oriented construction. It takes time.

“It looks like they have all the hardware, all the construction ready, and it’s still going on.”

The naval base extension will allow Beijing to increase its power in the South China Sea region.

In the area, China’s coast guard and navy already move through waters claimed by the other countries.

READ MORE: WW3 fears SURGE as Pompeo bolsters US-Taiwan ties in surprise move

“It is where most of the assets that you eventually see out there on the islands start out.”

The shallow seas are rough around the islets because of rough seas and distance from the Chinese mainland.

China has claimed approximately 90 percent of the 3.5 million-square-kilometer South China Sea.

Beijing has technological and military superiority over the region’s other claimants.

The region’s other territorial claimants are Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam.

These nations have challenged China’s claims.

Their challenge to China has been backed by the US.

Beijing claims the rich resources in the region, such as oil and gas.

They have also attempted to lay ownership over much of the region’s fishing territory.





Source link

Leave A Reply